Coming along, what do you think? Should be open to donors soon. 🙂
What is Stefan Molyneux's definition of truth?
Stefan Molyneux provides a few definitions of truth, including "a fact that has been verified" and "conformity to reality or actuality." He also suggests that truth is a conformity to something external to consciousness and independent of consciousness.
How does the story of the apple relate to conformity?
The story of the apple relates to conformity because it shows how people can be manipulated into conforming to a certain belief or behavior through the use of false dichotomies and moral judgments. By creating a false sense of morality around the ability to see an invisible apple, the elders in the story are able to trap children who have a natural inclination towards logical consistency or morality. This is an example of how conformity can be imposed on individuals through the use of moral judgments and false dichotomies.
What is the story of Simon the Boxer?
Simon is a boxer who was physically abused as a child. Since he was helpless to resist these attacks, he learned to master himself. He cannot master his attackers, so he can only master his reaction to their attacks. Simon grew up gaining a sense of efficacy and power by controlling his own pain, fear, and hatred. As he gets older, his parents slowly begin to reduce the amount of physical abuse they inflict on him. Simon finds that when he leaves the world of voluntary interactions and re-enters the world of violence and abuse, his anxiety vanishes. His sense of efficacy and control returns, and he feels mastery over his own world again. Simon became addicted to controlling his responses to abuse – thus he can no longer function in the absence of abuse.
What are some criticisms of Plato?
One criticism of Plato is that he is far more exploratory, incompletely systematic, elusive, and playful than other philosophers like Aristotle, Aquinas, and Kant. Another criticism is that since he does not affirm anything in any of his dialogues, it is difficult to attribute a philosophical doctrine to him as opposed to one of his characters. Additionally, his theory of forms specifically denies proof, which has led to controversy among those who study his writings. Finally, some argue that his ideas are not easily communicable and lack clarity, making them difficult for the average person to understand.
What are Stefan Molyneux's criticisms of Plato?
Stefan Molyneux criticizes Plato for being more of a literary genius than a philosophical genius. He also believes that Plato's works are exploratory, incompletely systematic, elusive, and playful, which he sees as negative qualities for a philosopher. Molyneux argues that philosophers run the world and that Plato's ideas have had a significant impact on politics, ethics, and art, which makes it important to accurately diagnose and provide relief for philosophical problems rather than being playful and elusive.
What are Stefan Molyneux's criticisms of Plato's Republic?
Stefan Molyneux criticizes Plato's Republic for its megalomania and lack of humility, as he believes that Plato's divine knowledge of the form leads to a totalitarian nightmare. He also criticizes Plato for using Socrates as a sock puppet to spew his own ideas, which he believes is a monstrous hijacking of a humble man's reputation. Molyneux also rejects Plato's rejection of Athenian democracy and his focus on producing philosopher kings, as he believes that it leads to a tyrannical rule by a single person.
What are Stefan Molyneux's criticisms of Ayn Rand?
Stefan Molyneux's criticisms of Ayn Rand are that he found the life that she portrayed in her novels not something he could connect to and live in a real sense. He also found that parenting was not really dealt with in her novels, and her characters were entirely self-made and isolated fortresses unto themselves. Additionally, he believes that her characters shrug off their past for the most part without any particular issues, which he found not believable or applicable in his life. However, he also acknowledges that he agrees with Ayn Rand on many philosophical points and that his criticisms are minor relative to the sort of radiant thought that she worked with.
What are Stefan Molyneux's criticisms of his mother?
Stefan Molyneux's criticisms of his mother are not explicitly stated in this context.
What are Stefan Molyneux's criticisms of mysticism?
There is no mention of Stefan Molyneux's criticisms of mysticism in the provided context.
According to Stefan Molyneux, where does reason come from?
There is no clear answer to this question in the given context. Stefan Molyneux discusses the relationship between facts and values, and the importance of accepting a discipline in order to engage in philosophical and moral debates. He also talks about the relevance of moral philosophy in light of new discoveries about the brain and consciousness. However, he does not explicitly state where reason comes from.
Please provide a detailed explanation of Universally Preferable Behaviour.
Universally Preferable Behaviour (UPB) is a concept in ethics that proposes that there are certain behaviors that are universally preferable for all human beings, at all times, and under all circumstances. The idea is that these behaviors are objectively better than others, and that they can be discovered through reason and empirical observation.
The concept of UPB is based on the idea that there are objective moral truths that can be discovered through reason and empirical observation. These moral truths are not based on personal preferences or cultural norms, but on what is objectively best for human beings.
The first word in UPB is "universally," which means that the behavior in question must be applicable to all human beings, regardless of their culture, religion, or personal preferences. This is important because it means that the behavior is not based on subjective opinions or cultural norms, but on objective facts about human nature.
The second word in UPB is "preferable," which means that the behavior is not only applicable to all human beings, but that it is also objectively better than other behaviors. This is important because it means that the behavior is not just a matter of personal preference, but is based on what is objectively best for human beings.
The third word in UPB is "behavior," which refers to measurable actions that occur within empirical and objective reality. This is important because it means that the concept of UPB is not just a matter of abstract ideas or theories, but is based on observable and measurable actions.
There are several arguments for the validity of UPB. The first argument is that if a scientific theory is valid, it must be supported by empirical observation. Similarly, if the concept of UPB is valid, then mankind should believe in universally preferable behavior. All men believe in universally preferable behavior, therefore empirical evidence exists to support the validity of universally preferable behavior.
The second argument is that since human beings have an almost-infinite number of choices to make in life, to say that there are no principles of universally preferable behavior would be to say that all choices are equal (i.e. subjective). However, all choices are not equal, either logically or through empirical observation.
The third argument is that there are many examples of common choices among humankind, which indicate that universally preferable behavior abounds and is part of human nature. For instance, if food is available, almost all human beings prefer to eat every day. When cold, almost all human beings seek warmth. Almost all parents choose to feed, shelter and… [incomplete sentence]
According to Stefan Molyneux, does spanking violate the non-aggression principle?
Yes, according to Stefan Molyneux, spanking violates the non-aggression principle and is considered an immoral action.
According to Stefan Molyneux, why does spanking violate the non-aggression principle?
According to Stefan Molyneux, spanking violates the non-aggression principle because it is the initiation of force against another human being, which is considered immoral. Spanking is not used in self-defense, but rather as a form of discipline or punishment for children, and it inflicts physical and emotional pain on the child. While there are times when the initiation of force can be considered moral, such as in the defense of another person's well-being, spanking does not meet these conditions and is therefore immoral.
According to Stefan Molyneux, how is self-defense justified morally?
Stefan Molyneux argues that self-defense is morally justified because violence is evil, and that which is evil can be prevented through the use of violence. Therefore, the use of force to oppose violence is morally valid. He also argues that if human beings cannot validly act to prevent harm to themselves, then actions such as inoculations, wearing gloves in the cold, putting on sunscreen or insect repellent, building a wall to prevent a landslide, brushing one’s teeth, wearing shoes and so on are all immoral actions.
Why is murder not UPB?
Murder is not UPB because the act of murder cannot be universally justified according to the UPB framework. UPB stands for Universally Preferable Behavior, which means that any moral proposition that is universally preferable must be logically consistent and applicable to all individuals in all situations. However, the act of murder, defined as intentionally and with premeditation killing someone, cannot be universally justified because it involves violating the basic right to life of another individual. Therefore, murder is not UPB.
[NOT A GREAT ANSWER]
Why is theft not UPB?
Theft is not UPB because stealing is only stealing if the owner of the property does not want it to be taken. If stealing were UPB, then it would mean that stealing is always acceptable and wanted, which is not possible because it contradicts the fact that stealing is only stealing if the owner does not want it to be taken. Therefore, stealing cannot be universally preferable behavior.
Why is assault not UPB?
Assault is not UPB because it must be unwanted in order for it to be assault. In other words, if two people are in a boxing ring and they are both punching each other voluntarily, they are accepting the possibility of injuries and it is not considered assault. Similarly, if one person wants to engage in sexual activity and the other person does not, it is considered rape or sexual assault. UPB requires actions that can be achieved by two people in a room at the same time, and if one person does not want something and the other person does, then it cannot be universalized.
Why is rape not UPB?
Rape is not UPB because it is not universally preferred behavior. UPB means that a behavior is universally preferred by all people at all times. However, rape is a behavior that is not preferred by the victim, and therefore cannot be universally preferred. It is a violation of the victim's autonomy and bodily integrity, and is universally considered to be an immoral act. Therefore, rape cannot be UPB.
According to Stefan Molyneux, how are property rights justified?
According to Stefan Molyneux, property rights are justified because anyone who acts in any way, shape or form - including arguing - is axiomatically exercising 100% control over his own body, and "homesteading" both oxygen and sound waves in order to make his case. Thus, by combining this axiomatic reality with UPB, we can easily understand that since anyone debating property rights is exercising 100% control over his own property, the only question is whether or not property rights vary from individual to individual - a question definitively settled by the axiomatic fact of self-ownership, as well as the UPB framework. Any moral proposition must be universal and consistent, and this is how we also know that everyone has 100% property rights.