0:32 - Market Reactions and Sleep Struggles
1:22 - Death of an Estranged Parent
3:26 - Late Night Viewing Choices
4:58 - Political Overreach and Public Response
7:50 - Election Surprises and Voter Shifts
10:34 - Bitcoin and Economic Outlook
14:00 - Demographics and Voting Patterns
16:36 - Dr. Naomi Wolf’s Evolution
21:24 - COVID Mandates and Generational Perspectives
24:37 - Marriage and Gender Gaps
32:28 - Political Engagement and Feedback
35:42 - The Impact of Social Media
37:43 - War in Ukraine and Abortion Debate
42:06 - Personal Confrontations and Corruption
50:13 - The Role of Morality and Compromise in Politics
52:13 - The Future of Political Dynamics
1:05:05 - Observations on Public Endorsements
In this episode, I provide an analysis of the significant political events and market fluctuations that occurred recently, particularly focusing on the aftermath of the recent elections. With the Dow Jones soaring by 1300 points and Bitcoin hitting a remarkable $74,000, I reflect on the implications this has for individual investors and the broader economic landscape. I probe the psychological impact of these changes, noting that many are experiencing anxiety and fear stemming from past events, such as the tumultuous year of 2020.
I delve into my personal experience during the election night, including the late hours I spent refreshing electoral maps and cryptocurrency prices, and how this relates to the broader trends I’m observing in both politics and finance. The discussion extends to viewer experiences, memories of previous elections, and the unique challenges presented during this election cycle. The conversation captures the thrill and trepidation many felt during this critical moment in our history.
As I analyze the voting patterns and significant demographic shifts, it becomes clear that certain groups, such as Hispanic males and rural voters, have played an influential role in shaping the results. I highlight the historical context of these changes and address how perceptions of political alignment are shifting, particularly among different income brackets and racial demographics. This exploration leads us to consider how the Democratic Party's traditional stronghold among working-class voters is being tested.
Further, I tackle the implications of these results for the future of cryptocurrency and governmental policies surrounding digital assets. With over 200 pro-Bitcoin advocates now occupying significant positions in government, I discuss the potential for Bitcoin to become a strategic part of U.S. financial policy moving forward. I also provide optimistic outlooks regarding taxes, regulatory changes, and the overall evolving landscape of digital currencies, suggesting that innovation in this sector could thrive in the coming years.
Authentic conversations with viewers also spark discussions about the impact of societal issues on voting behavior, such as the concerns surrounding COVID-19 mandates and their lasting effects on the public psyche. I highlight how the intersection of personal beliefs, political party perceptions, and societal pressures will shape political and social dynamics in the near future.
Moreover, the episode reflects on the broader philosophical implications of these trends, questioning our relationships with authority, governance, and personal agency. Each election carries the weight of historical precedence, influencing how citizens perceive the legitimacy of democratic processes and their own participation.
Overall, this episode not only captures the pulse of current events but also invites listeners to reflect on their personal experiences, the societal shifts that accompany these elections, and the philosophical underpinnings of our collective journey toward understanding freedom, responsibility, and the role of government in our lives.
[0:01] Yes good morning everybody just a little quick flash live stream to talk about what went on last night and yeah Dow up 1300 Bitcoin at 74k that's 103.5 Canadian which is up 6700 dollars in a day or day and a half so that's not too shabby and I guess what are your thoughts tell me what your thoughts are, what your experience was.
[0:32] Was anybody like, I'm afraid of going to sleep because of PTSD from 2020. I can't go to sleep because the numbers are going to shift. You got a solid five hour and up. Yeah, I got a couple of hours sleep last night. I was up until probably 3.30 in the morning.
[0:51] And then I woke up at eight. So I got a couple of hours, four hours asleep. And so, yeah, I just wanted to know what your thoughts were. And also, who did you watch last night? I'm just curious about that as well. Who did you watch? Okay, so let me just get your thoughts and comments. So, you know, we'll have a good old indulgence in politics. You know, like, I can just return to the crack pipe one more time, and then I'll be fine, man. I'll be totally fine.
[1:22] Okay, so what are people saying here? How to deal with the death of an estranged parent?
[1:29] Uh that's a topic for another time uh i don't really know how to answer that my dad died um i really didn't care uh i'm not gonna get sentimental about choices i made 25 years ago so uh okay uh hello howdy good morning uh let's see here good afternoon from krakow poland nice to feel like the wall might not reach us after all. Well, I'll talk about that. I'll talk about that. So, you're looking great. Why, thank you. That's what matters, right? That's what matters. Very dramatic lighting. It looks like a portrait studio. Yes, I have my dark side and my light side. I'm getting all kinds of Jungian, yet rare appearance from dark Stef. That's right. You look particularly wise with this lighting style. Yes. Doesn't it make me look younger? Young Stef. 58.
[2:26] Let's see here, I can't help but feel it's just a little bit of added misery for the Harris voters who have no practical skills, you know the type, let's see here. What sleep? That's right, me. Yeah, bad sleep. Yeah, yeah. Newborn was up with gas from 1 to 5 a.m. Oh, I'm sorry about that. That's tough. I slept pretty great, actually. Apigenin? Apigenin? And magnesium plus being busy has worked out pretty well. Couldn't stop watching Daily Wire. I watched a bit of Dan Bongino last night. I touched in on the Matt Walsh, Ben Shapiro, but I just, I find it too stomach-turning, repulsive to me as a whole. We have four years to take full advantage of. Stayed up way too late. Your mic is a little too harsh, Stef. Is that right? Other people finding it too harsh.
[3:26] Let's see here. You watched Scott Adams and Fox News. You watched Crowder. I dipped into Crowder. I saw an actor I really like, James Woods, I was in, but they weren't really talking about much of anything.
[3:42] But I basically was refreshing the Electoral College map and refreshing two computers and then refreshing the Bitcoin price. So pretty wild, pretty wild. Could only sleep when they called Pennsylvania. Yeah, isn't that wild? This is the kind of overreach, right? So there was peanut the squirrel, which was the government's way of saying, we have people who will toss your house and make you sit in the cold for over a squirrel, which means we can do anything we want to you. None of the police probably seem to have said, well, that's crazy. I'm not doing that. And the other thing, of course, was that didn't they raid a bunch of Mennonites and all of that in Pennsylvania? Didn't they do all of that? Was it Mennonites or the other group? They raided them over milk, and I think that got them out in a sense of their 18th century bubble to vote. And that was, as somebody pointed out on X last night, that was kind of like the tree ends joining the battle in Lord of the Rings. So let's see here.
[4:58] Worried about the Senate races being fortified? Yeah. Watched Alex Jones like the good old days? Let's see here. So watched the Tucker stream? And Dan Bongino was like half a million people live at some point. That's really, really something.
[5:17] Fox live streamed and the Young Turks to see the sadness and confusion. Very sad. You watch Scott Adams, Ratteloud with Crowder, MSM. It's while Trump won the popular vote. Um, I don't think it is, but we'll sort of can get into that, if you like. So, Uh, people's pundit, Robert Barnes, nailed the prediction. Yeah. I mean, I did say last week that assuming no massive cheating, Trump certainly had the numbers. So, uh, thank you for the recent show on gentle parenting versus peaceful parenting. Very helpful. I will send a tip through the website. Thank you. Thank you very much. Maybe the Harris voters will question their worldview. This was a landslide. Well, I don't think, uh, oh, Amish. Yeah. Sorry. It was the Amish farmers, right? Scott Pressler got 180,000 Amish first-time voters registered. Yeah. Yeah. Amish farmers were attacked for selling raw milk in Pennsylvania. Yeah. So that flipped a lot.
[6:24] So that's, uh, that was, that was very interesting. Yeah. The Amish. Thank you. I couldn't, I just had a brain fart. Couldn't remember the name because I'm cooking a little sleep, but that's fine. So, the best part is he closed the gaps in the states he lost, says Dave, and just went much further in the popular votes of red states. All I was thinking of was R versus K. Well, so, I mean, there were three groups that were surprising to a lot of people in the election last night. Of course, the first group was the rural voters. And I said, of course, I've been saying for years, but I said in particular, it was, I guess, kind of coded, but I said in particular, you've heard my rants about the people who work with their hands are practical and sensible and less susceptible to propaganda because they work with their hands. And so they were the people of rural voters who are less susceptible to the propaganda. And it was Hispanic males and white females who push things over the edge. But the Hispanic males, it makes sense. I mean, I said this many years ago that people who leave, say, Mexico to come to America, come to America because they like America and they don't like Mexico as much. So they don't want Mexico to they don't want America to become Mexico, right? And so they would push back hard against that. And what that means, of course, is that the Hispanic males will probably be turned on by the left, which means that they will probably be more keen on immigration restrictions. And so that is probably the case as a whole.
[7:51] And the white females still voted significantly more than white males for the left, but were a slim majority of voting for the Republicans. And that's because, as a whole, it's because of some of the trans issues and the men in women's sports issues or the formerly men in women's sports issues or however we would rephrase that.
[8:18] And that was a big shift. I don't think that there was a single, even county or precinct where Kamala Harris did better than Joe Biden, which, of course, raises the inevitable question that it would be very interesting to get some answers on. I don't know that we ever will get any answers on. But, of course, the significant question is, why did it go, you know, last couple of elections to this election, you know, 60 million votes for Democrats, 60 million votes for Democrats, That's 80 million votes for Democrats in 2020 and then back down to 60 million votes in 2024. That's quite wild that you had 20 million more voters that just vanished, right? You can see this line, 60 million, 60 million, boop, 80 million in 2020 and then back to 60 million. So, I mean, I think we all can theorize as to why that occurred. But it is one of these things that would be great to get some answers to, but I am not entirely convinced we ever will get answers to that.
[9:27] All right, sorry, let me just get to some of the things that I have saved here. And we'll go, we'll go back, you know, I'll just dip in, you know, just this one time. Right? Just this one time. So there is a good stuff for Bitcoin, right? There is more than 200 pro Bitcoiners now at high levels of the government and in the house. The government is not openly hostile to digital assets, at least because of this election. Gary Gensler is gone. This is from Craig, Fred Kruger. It is likely the banks will soon be able to custody Bitcoin. Biden vetoed it, SAB 121. Gary Gensler is gone.
[10:08] DeFi and crypto projects of all stripes are in. Innovation is in. Bitcoin can take center stage in this new digital asset world. It seems likely that Trump is going to ban central bank digital currencies. that's plus. The unrealized capital gains tax is dead for at least the next four years. Tax rates are going lower, not higher. That's good for Bitcoiners as a whole. We'll probably see in-kind ETFs fairly soon. You will be able to swap your hard Bitcoin for an ETF without tax consequences in the near future.
[10:34] The US will implement a Bitcoin strategic reserve. There will be modest contributions to it. Other nations will follow suit. I mean, wouldn't it be wild if the debt can be paid off in Bitcoin? It's pretty wild, right? Individual states will start their own bitcoin reserves pension funds and other institutions will quickly get on board trad 5 will view as coast clear for advisor allocations the average hnw account will be managed into three to five percent bitcoin maybe higher interest rates worldwide will go down on the short end and the generally soft economy and doge cuts that's the department of government efficiency will keep inflation in check providing a cover for massive transformation.
[11:14] So, that's wild. That's wild. So, There's a class realignment in this last election. So Harris lost despite a major shift of wealthy voters her way. So in 2020, Trump won voters who had over 100,000 per year in income, 54 to 52. 2024, Harris wins voters over 100K, 54 to 45.
[11:49] So Trump had a massive improvement with voters under 50K. So, of course, the left has traditionally or historically positioned themselves as the party of the working class, which is why when I debated those couple of communists, I pointed out that they were supporting my deplatforming, that they were all in on multinational corporations against the working class, because I definitely come from the working class. So that the left became the party of the elites and lost the working classes. I mean, they've become government workers and they're very wealthy. That's the left as a whole. And that just doesn't resonate, of course, with those who make less money. So in 2020, Biden won voters who made less than 50K, 55 to 45. In 2024, Trump won them 49 to 48.
[12:46] And Biden in 2020, people who make 50 to 100,000, Biden won 57 to 42, 2024, Trump was 49 to 47. So the wealthy went to the left and the poor went to the right. And that is quite, quite inevitable. So just for the numbers, so whites as a whole were 71, sorry, whites as a whole were 55%, Republican blacks were 12%, but that was broken down. The black males went heavy into Trump, so he sometimes doubled his.
[13:25] Support among black males. And this is the funny thing is that the lawfare against Trump resonates a lot with black males, who, of course, themselves perceive that they're unfairly targeted by law enforcement. And so I hate to sort of say, you know, street cred or, you know, thug life or anything like that. But for black males, the fact that Trump was, in their view, unfairly targeted by law enforcement, gave him a lot of street cred and sympathy. Black females were still overwhelmingly like 95 plus percent for the left.
[14:01] Hispanics and Latino for 45 percent to 53 percent R to D. Asians, 38 percent to 56 percent. And the Stop Asian Hate movement was pretty important in terms of shifting people to the right to law enforcement.
[14:17] American Indian, 64 percent Republican. I was surprised at that. So that was pretty wild. That was pretty wild. So there's going to be a shift, I think, in the left's view of Hispanics, and that's pretty wild. So Kamala lost all of the heavily Arab and Muslim districts in Michigan, south end of Dearborn, east and west Dearborn, Dearborn Heights. Dearborn was 47% Trump, 27% Harris, 21% Stein. So the Michigan vote seems to have done a lot to Costa, Michigan, which is a big swing state, which of course comes down to Gaza. So, sorry, 60 million, let's just look at the, so in 2016, 65 million Democrats voted, in 2020, 81 million Democrats voted, 2024, 65 million Democrats voted. So, that's wild.
[15:12] The fact that Trump lost in 2020, I think, hardened his resolve and allowed him to gather a truly wild dream team. Like, I mean, the combination of Trump, RFK Jr., Tulsi Gabbard, Elon Musk, J.D. Vance, that is a wild team, two former Democrats. And J.D. Vance is a true force of nature. I mean, especially given his traumatized childhood, which he wrote about in Hillbilly Elegy, he is remarkably calm, obviously very good-natured, a very positive fellow, easygoing, relatable, likable, good sense of humor, doesn't take himself too seriously. And in my view, is a little bit too gentle in his pushback, but you know, whatever, it's hard to argue with the winners. So that is, that is something that dream team would not have been assembled in 2020.
[16:00] So it's going to be very, very interesting to see what happens from here. Peter Schiff writes, and it's important to get Peter's perspective on these things. He says, Trump won't balance the budget with entitlements, defense, and interest on the debt off the table. Even if he eliminated 50% of all other spending annual deficits would still exceed a trillion dollars, plus the non-cut categories will grow and taxes will be cut, so deficits will soar. Well, except that there will be people who are moved, as what happened with Trump in the past prior to COVID, people were moved off food stamps and the welfare rolls into the workforce, which lowers government spending and increases government receipts. So that's a possibility.
[16:37] The interesting question And watching the evolution of Dr. Naomi Wolf is really quite fascinating.
[16:45] So, as she wrote, what assured the victory this time? Citizens had cell phones. They took pictures of ballots and video of events. They looked up election laws. Elon Musk let them share all these. Their new machines were not infallible. They had eyes on the polling stations and election workers. I do believe our daily cloud portal to photograph and upload the vote was a deterrent. They also had James O'Keefe on site. They had Emerald Robertson. They had Mike Lindell, who braved nonstop mockery to true the vote. They had true the vote. They had protectthevote.org, Steve Stern ban on the precinct strategy they had empowered watchers everywhere threats to arrest criminal election officials sent a chill I know my former quote team and the faces and statements you saw were people who had planned a massive complex cheaper watching key elements peel away I don't yeah I mean obviously those things were important, but to me I don't know I mean this may never be known for sure but in my view they kind of knew they were going to lose after the debate performance between Biden and Trump revealed Biden's.
[17:42] Extremely compromised mental faculties. I think after that, it was just going through the motions because that's the wild thing about this election, how undramatic it was. Like for those of you who were younger and you weren't around for the prior elections in the U.S., as in other places as well, but I mean, they were wild. I mean, you know, the Summer of Love, the George Floyd riots, the October surprises, the Billy Bush stuff. I mean, there was no big October surprise. I mean, other than, oh, here's some recordings of Epstein talking trash about Trump and why they thought that would get any traction, I can't even imagine. But no big riots, no big racial hoaxes, no big anti-blue stuff, no big October surprise. It just didn't seem to happen. So I kind of think that they knew they were toast back months ago, but I think they just kind of had to go through the motions because what Kamala Harris spent like a billion dollars and had most of the media and academia and Hollywood on their side. And that's really, really something.
[18:46] Let's see here. So by race, white men were 59% Republican, white women, 52% Republican versus 47 percent black men were 20 percent republican black women were seven percent latino men 54 percent latino women 37 and all other races were 45 so uh white men white women and black men seem to have uh pushed this over the line and that's really uh really something.
[19:21] That's really something. And this is always sort of a big question when you get things wrong. And of course, I've got things wrong over the years, but you have to have a sort of very vigorous look at your own self and work to improve. It was really interesting to see how Trump and other people who failed in 2020 had a postmortem that went on for years where they said, you know, here's what I did wrong. Trump says, I hired the wrong people. I listened to the wrong people. I was that self-reflection. And what doesn't seem to happen as much on the left is sort of a rigorous analysis. I think Van Jones did a little bit where he said, look, we keep telling people they're Nazis and they're evil, and they drove Musk away, and they drove other people away. Like, you can't keep attacking people and then expect them to support you. So that, but it seems to be very, very hard to stop that kind of stuff. So that is...
[20:18] That is really, that is really something. That is really, really something. And, you know, I think the anxiety that some people had, and in particular women, the anxiety that they had around, you know, people don't like to feel nervous, right? And women tend to be a little bit more high in neuroticism than men. Men have their flaws and virtues. Women have their flaws and virtues. But I think women were like, I don't want to feel necessarily, because whether it's true or not, but there was this, you know, stuff that was going around that, uh, the, um, uh, the women who were born as men, uh, what is the, uh, uh, assigned male at birth, right? The, the AMABs, uh, that there was concern that women, uh, was having about them being in the change rooms of their daughters or, uh, the washrooms and so on. And right or wrong, there was this concern and people just get kind of tired about that sort of nervousness or anxiety and they just want to make it go away you know for right or wrong that just seems to be a thing that happens um.
[21:24] Uh, the mandates also were not very positive. Uh, you know, there's, there's the whole COVID thing. And I could do hours on the whole COVID thing, of course. Right. But just sort of very briefly, uh, the COVID thing has become very powerful because it's not being discussed, right? There's almost, the reason we discuss things is to take away their power. The reason that we name things and talk about things, even taboo topics is to take away their power because otherwise you are surrendering to fear and the unconscious tends to manifest it in ways. And so the mandates and the aggression and the take kids away from people who won't vaccinate them and throw them in camps and like all of that stuff was is not discussed about, not talked about. And then it manifests in this pushback because the mandates were really tough for for a lot of people. Gen X represent. Right. So Gen X is very, very interesting. This was almost 23,000 total respondents, of course, it's a survey, so who knows. But Gen X were 53% Trump, 45% Harris.
[22:28] And so every other 18 to 29, 42% Trump, 55% Harris, 30 to 44 were 46% Trump, 51% Harris, 65 and older were 49% Trump, 50% Harris. So the 45 to 64, the Gen X, were 53% Trump, 45% Harris. And I think that's because we're old enough to remember what it was like before the general leftist baiting and hysteria.
[23:03] Yeah, the fact that a lot of people who were unvaccinated had the experience of which the blacks tragically had, of course, under statism, of sort of Jim Crow segregation laws that you weren't allowed to eat in restaurants, that you weren't allowed to travel, that you weren't allowed often to have a job or like the incredible amounts of ostracism and legal barriers to having a life. I think going through that was pretty rough. It was pretty rough.
[23:36] So let's see here. Yeah, the marriage gap is as big as the gender gap. So there was an 11 percentage point gap in Harris support between married and unmarried, which is pretty wild, right? So married women were 55% Trump, 44% Harris, and not married women were 41% Trump, 55% Harris, and that's bigger than the gender gap. So this, of course, is why you see all of these movies where the guy seems to be nice, but turns out to be evil and violent. Like the housemaid is a novel about this. And of course, Endless is Sleeping with the Enemy. There's Endless movies about, you know, he just, he seems so perfect. And then he turns out to be just a monster, right? Just scaring people away from marriage and therefore into the arms of the state. People would rather others be loveless and paranoid than happy and conservative. That is really, really tough. Really tough.
[24:37] So, and debt, of course, a big issue too, right? Men have paid off a significant portion of their student loans since 2009. Women have not. Women have barely paid off anything. So, just waiting for money to come as a whole is one of the big challenges for uh for women as a whole so, let's see here let me get back to your comments and questions and uh.
[25:09] The dead stay at home last night, right? Right. In my experience, Hispanics don't care about political correctness in the slightest. Well, I'm sure you've seen these videos of the guy with the absurd sombrero and the big mustache and the Mexico rap, and the Mexicans think it's hilarious. This is why the Puerto Rico joke, you know, it didn't really, I mean, in my experience, and of course, I've talked to a lot of Hispanics over the course of the show, a very good sense of humor about themselves, very funny, don't take themselves too seriously, so the idea that they got roasted, and that, oh my god, right, that's, that's not, that's projection, projecting your own fragility onto Hispanics, who are pretty robust about all of that stuff, so.
[25:54] All right, let's see here. Anna Kasparian has been shifting away from leftism. yeah i uh i can't tell you how little she's on my radar right uh harris needed the young non-white male vote and they stayed home so men uh as a whole um we we don't like to be nacked right we don't we don't like to be nacked and so when um women are nagging us uh and this was a bit A bit dicey when it came to a lot of the sort of trad wives or trad women on the right were sort of nagging men rather than, this is why I put this video out about just apologize to men, right? But for the non-white male vote, the fact that Kamala Harris appeared to be just sort of nagging at them probably gave them mom flashbacks and they didn't want to get into the obedience matrix, so to speak. Crime in blue cities and suburbs affect white single women's world on the day-to-day.
[27:01] Somebody says, I'm in Germany, and the media is going crazy here. Sad, but satisfying to see them freak out. People are so brainwashed here that Trump will get less than 10% probably. Well, of course, I mean, I think Sernovich pointed this out that, you know, Europe had basically half threatened to arrest Elon Musk. And that's, you know, so I mean, for Germany and other places, you know, they want all of their money to bribe the voters. And when Trump gets in, what happens? Well, that money goes a little bit bye-bye, because he wants them to pay their own damn share for protecting the continent. And so, of course, they're going to be hysterical about it. I mean, there's some ideology there, but it is just, of course, a lot of money. Yeah, thanks for the tip. I appreciate that. I'm breaking character doing a little politics here. And if you appreciate that, and if you like that, then you can, of course, tip me now or freedomend.com slash donate. I appreciate that. Assassination attempt and Trump's reaction resonated with the male voters as well. That was gangster man i mean that was that was straight up gangster oh yeah the fact i mean the fact that elon musk is going on ron paul's liberty report apparently and ron paul's gonna join the department of government efficiency this would not have happened in 2020 right i mean there's no such thing as victory and defeat they're simply adjustments in strategy right it's not i mean other than death there's no final win or loss they're simply adjustments in strategy so.
[28:22] All right um somebody dave says i think the biggest factor is in the no steal at three AM this year, no COVID mail-in cover story, and I think Trump has been approved by one side of the powers that be, hence all the excellent teammates who are part of the system. Yeah.
[28:37] Well, I mean, I think there is a general idea that there's a plus in appeasement until there's not. Because some people, if you treat them with some sort of positive response and so on, they'll get better, right? They'll improve and they'll respond with gratitude. But other people will just, you know, turn the knife, take the advantage, turn the thumbscrews and so on. And so I think what happened was people were like okay well there's these people who want more inclusiveness and so on okay let's include them and hopefully they'll be happy and then if you include people and then they just demand more and more and more then you there's a sort of human instinct to just kind of really push back really push back.
[29:20] Once they got rid of Biden apparently they had to keep Harris as someone or else they would have had to refund all the donations to me their heart really wasn't wasn't in it wasn't in it and of course i i watched the debate between uh trump and harris and harris's answers were so absolutely perfect it was ridiculously suspicious just for me right i don't have any proof just ridiculous i mean there's just no way you just have perfect answers with no errs ums ands or flubs in that situation so elon is important narrative control is much more difficult without twitter under their control well i mean that is really something i I mean, that is really something. Twitter was massive, of course, in this election. The free speech options under Twitter means that it's a little tougher. It's a lot tougher to get away with stuff, right?
[30:10] Economically, I really hope Trump does the Javier Millet. Yeah, well, he's certainly got some motive to do that. Thank you for the tip. Let's see here. With regards to civil unrest, I scooted out of the city. I've been in for the night and I've been checking the news, but I haven't seen anything to have been worried about. Yeah. Yeah. Blaming other people for your mistakes is the ultimate display of laziness. Yes. Yes, for sure. I hope he goes forward without regard for upsetting people. It's his last time in office ever unless one of his kids run. Well, it's still his last time in office, right? The interesting point in the election was Biden just being senile wearing a MAGA hat or calling Trump supporters garbage I don't um I mean obviously he was annoyed uh with with Harris he wasn't there for Harris's uh uh election party uh so I don't think he was on board with all of that and so but I I think he was just rumbling, I think he was just mumbling and rambling I don't think it was some sort of big, Machiavellian pre-planned uh thing, All right.
[31:31] I still see people wearing masks. It's absurd. Well, but don't judge everyone who's wearing a mask, right? Some people are wearing masks for other medical issues, right? Latinos came out and voted our values. Well, that was a lot of truth to that, right? A lot of truth about that. If Harris had simply been able to praise men, she would have won. I mean, that's the wild thing to me. Like, if Harris had simply come out and praised men, But instead of this, like, I'm talking, right? And then, you know, I'm talking here, I'm talking. It's like, you know, men, we know that there's a hurly-burly in discussion. And sometimes you over-talk the other person. Sometimes the other person over-talks you. There's a hurly-burly in debates. And you try not to, you know, I'm talking, you know, shut the other person down and so on, right? Am I wrong or is the culture starting to shift, right? A sprinkling of current events is always nice. Thanks again, Stef. I appreciate that. Thank you for the tip. So, yeah.
[32:29] Appreciate you staff whatever you discuss thank you i appreciate that listen to the re-release of r versus k yesterday very good and timely thank you thank you for discussing politics really missed it i mean i don't know do you find this interesting, joy reed ranting on embassy at white women yeah well that's.
[32:51] So, um, there's a very popular tweet about a woman saying, well, women just have to stop sleeping with men. I mean, that's really sad. That's really sad.
[33:06] Um, she might have won if she got pregnant. Well, she's 60, right? I missed your political fakes for so long. I miss Stef, but discussing politics, I have to be honest. Well and i i mean it was it was a fight i couldn't get into i i couldn't get involved anyway even if i wanted to i know there were times that i wanted to but i i couldn't uh i, couldn't reputation wise it's too much splash damage right all right uh any thoughts on uh peter thiel palantir and his connection to vance um nothing in particular i i wouldn't know enough to really talk about that i haven't uh she is 60 yeah i mean you it's in the neck right i don't Look, it's in the neck, right? Well, that's also because I have the scar. Excuse me. Pardon me. Maybe one political stream a month for supporters? Maybe. Maybe. Well, I mean, I don't want to, I'm not trying to sort of get any praise here, but do you miss the politics? Do you want the politics? Do you like the politics? Just hit me with a minus 10 to a plus 10 on whether you want or don't want politics. Minus 10 don't want politics at all plus 10 would love it on a daily in my veins mainline basis.
[34:22] Love you bunches thank you i appreciate that uh your hundred year plan to focus on philosophy so much more important though oh thank you plus five for politics zero, plus four plus 10 minus 50 that's a scattering uh okay and i really appreciate this feedback I really do appreciate this feedback. So, yeah, somebody's gone even further back. This is Viva Frey, a rather shark-haired guy. I think he's Canadian, lives in Florida. The exact number of votes for the Democrat, according to Wikipedia. Oh, God, Wikipedia. Well, if it's math, they might not lie. 2008, Obama gets 69 million. 2012, Obama gets 65 million, 2016, Hillary gets 65 million, 2020, Joe Biden gets 81 million, 2024, Kamala Harris gets 66 million. One of these things is not like the other. Yes, yes. And of course, it is a plus that they're not going to be gunning quite as much for the electoral college because Trump got 5 mil plus of the popular vote as well.
[35:42] Uh, it's so funny that banning the Babylon Bee set these things in motion. And let's also pour one out for the squirrel corpse, right? Because, um, believe it or not, Peanut had a lot to do with it.
[35:56] Uh, hey staff, happy 6th of November. Thank you for the tip. It snowed last night here in Colorado, so the angry mobs have stayed inside. Well, you know, that's not a small thing. Poorer people and students younger poorer people don't have cars when the weather is bad they have to walk bike or take the bus if it's snowing they have to take the bus it's slushy it's unpleasant and so uh bad weather whereas you know if you're in a comfortable car you could drive out with the heater on so uh if um if you're poor and and young you tend to vote less when the weather is bad sort of for very simple reasons right a philosophical analysis of current events that's what i actually miss all right well would you would you like a spicy take this is super spicy would you like yes harambe and peanut right, would you like a a very spicy tape take no one breaks down politics like you Stef i appreciate that. I appreciate that. Thank you. Politics is kind of junk food. Well, a little bit, except, except, you know, the, the, the, the price of not getting involved in politics is a Plato statement is the being ruled by idiots. Basically. I mean, junk food is voluntary political stuff, input inputs, no matter what. Right. Okay. I think we're on the plus politics side. Okay.
[37:22] Well, yes. Kamala has not conceded the election. Yeah. That's really something. You know, that's really something. That's really something. The spice. The spice. Okay. The spiciest of all takes. So this is the spiciest of all takes. Or at least as spicy as I'm willing to go.
[37:44] So this comes down a lot. And there's lots of things that are going on with this election. But to me, it comes down to the war in Ukraine. It comes down to the war in Ukraine. It comes down to abortion. So, let's just talk about the war in Ukraine. So, of course, and I covered all of this back in 2014 about the coup and the color revolution and so on in Ukraine, but basically what happened was in the early 90s, so after the fall of.
[38:15] Russia said, okay, you can unify Germany and Germany can join NATO, but you can't go any further east. Like we're not having missiles right on our border, right?
[38:25] And I mean, this is exactly the same rationale as caused the Cuban Missile Crisis in 62, right? So they said, don't go east. And so then they kept going east and then they were going to have install missiles in Ukraine, have Ukraine join NATO. And Russia was like, nope, can't have that. Plus, of course, there are a lot of Nazis in Ukraine, and Nazism was not a friend to Russia, to put it mildly, and of course Russia's been invaded countless times, Napoleon, Hitler, others, and so they don't like that. The Western European alliance right on their border is not an acceptable thing. You can say right or wrong, but then just tell them, I'm not justifying anything, I'm simply talking about the perspectives, right? So the Ukrainian war was entirely preventable. In fact, to some degree it was provoked. And so, I don't know how many hundreds of thousands of people have been slaughtered men, right? How many hundreds of thousands of men have been, it's probably 400,000, 500, I don't know what, maybe James, you could look it up, but I don't even know if they know, but what is the head count? And you've got guys, you know, my age, and maybe a little younger, being sort of dragged out of their bed, being given an old rifle and being sent out to be disassembled by Western-funded drones. It's monstrous. The war is, very few wars are necessary, but this is one of the more unnecessary wars. And so.
[39:49] The people, and I'm going to caricature this a little bit, but not too much. I want to be fair, but I want to be vivid, right? So the people who are willing to have war candidates in office in order to murder their own babies are about the most demonic entities that I can think of. They're literally willing to vote warmongers in, in order to retain the right to kill their own babies. Now, listen, you can have a debate. I get this. You can have this debate around the edge cases of abortion. I get that. And I've had this debate on the show. There's a debate I had with a woman about abortion that was really spicy and good. That's available in the premium section. So you who are donors will be able to check that out. It's a very good debate. I can completely understand you can have debates about rape and incest and so on. And, you know, marginal cases about genetic disorders, marginal cases about the health of the mother. So you can have those debates, but this killing babies at full term, even killing babies after they're born, that's monstrous, right? That's monstrous. I mean, if you're raped, a horrifying thing, you take the morning after pill, you should be okay.
[40:57] Incest is monstrous, and so all of that. So, but as I made the case, you can put incest into the category of rape, morally speaking. I've made that sort of case before. So, the people who will vote for warmongers, and they will be fine in a sense, or maybe even enthusiastic, but at least they're okay with warmongers provoking and running wars, and just the Ukraine one is particularly vivid, so they're willing to have hundreds of thousands of people slaughtered, half of countries destroyed, in order to retain the ability to kill healthy babies at term, at will. That is something. Yeah, no man over 18 is allowed to leave Ukraine. Open border was also a big issue. No, I get that. Yeah, for sure. I get that.
[42:00] But this is absolutely monstrous, right?
[42:06] So people, this is one of the reasons I got out of politics, is that people want politicians to fight the fights that they need to have in their relationships. And of course, I'm talking sort of peace and voluntarism at all times, right? So what happens now is Trump is, they're hoping that Trump is going to deal with corruption in the political environment, right? And I'm here to tell you that that's not how it's going to be solved, right i mean this goes all the way back to my against me argument from like 20 years ago it's not going to be solved in the political arena so what people are hoping is that trump will solve the problem of hard leftism of wokeism of the the equity fetish and all this kind of stuff right russian uh thanks james russian and ukrainian casualties are hard to pin down russian source says 71 000 confirmed kill killed july 2024 economist puts it at five to 10 times that number. Russian estimates for Ukrainian casualties is near half a million. Western estimates put it at 80,000.
[43:18] So hundreds of thousands could be as high as three quarters of a million or even higher. And that's just killed, right? There's also wounded, there's shell-shocked, traumatized, tinnitus, hearing loss, various injuries and sleeplessness and PTSD and all of this. So, I mean, it just, it's absolutely monstrous. War is an absolute last resort. And so if there was, I just tell you personally, if there was someone in my life who cheered on war in order to retain the right to kill babies. I would view that person as corrupt almost beyond words, and I would never have that person within a million miles of my heart, my mind, my soul, and my family, certainly my child.
[44:10] Does this make sense? I'm not saying whether you agree with it. I'm just saying that you understand where I'm coming from. Yeah, kids who will have to be raised by traumatized parent or no parent, right? The father's gone. So you've got fatherlessness, which means that when there's fatherlessness, the creeps move in and molest the babies and the children. So cheering war in order to kill babies is about as corrupt and immoral a mindset as can be conceived of. So, the corruption and the evil that needs to be fought and rejected is at the personal level. This is at the personal level. So, thinking that Trump's going to solve this problem, you know, if you have, I don't care, friends, family member, I don't care. I don't care because morals are bigger than blood, right? So, if there are people in your life who cheer on the mass slaughter of people in order to retain the right to kill healthy babies at term. Why you would have anyone like that within a million miles of your heart, soul, and family is unbelievably, completely, and totally incomprehensible to me.
[45:36] I mean, I saw this very powerful video where a man was saying that the devil cannot kill God, so he does the next best thing, which is kill God's children. So um how do you think trump will deal with ukraine war stop funding and diplomacy with russia well the ukraine war is not super hard to deal with i mean i don't want to be like mr oh it's easy because i'm not doing it but to me the ukraine war is not that complicated to to deal with yeah of course you stop funding it because there's been no declaration of war and you get involved in combatants, right? So you stop funding it. And what else do you do? Well, you try to address Russia's concerns, and you don't, you recognize the universal principles that you can't have a historical enemy on your doorstep with missiles. I mean, that's exactly what happened with Cuba. Everybody understands that you can't have a historical enemy on your doorstep with missiles. No country would accept that. No country would allow that. So you simply address those concerns and the war is over. You find some compromise and you withdraw the troops and you tell Europe that they're going to have to pay for their own national defense and they're going to have to pay for their own continental defense and America's going to start funding all of this stuff and then the war ends. Like it's honestly, it's going to end very quickly.
[47:06] Somebody says, my best friend online is a 100% disabled army sergeant with PTSD, lost several inches in height when the mounted gun on his Humvee landed on him after it hit an IED in Afghanistan, haunts him still. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Well, and Putin has already signaled that he's willing to talk to Trump, right?
[47:31] So, that's what, and this is the kind of stuff that people, I'm not saying you guys, but this is the kind of stuff where people get, because nobody wants to have those personal confrontations, and I understand it, those personal confrontations, and I wouldn't even have a confrontation myself. Like, if I had some family member, some friends, somebody in my circle who was weeping because a war might end and healthy at-term babies might be protected, I wouldn't even have a conversation with someone like that. Like, I wouldn't, like, what can you say? You can't say that. You can't say anything about that, right? You can't say anything.
[48:16] It would just be, there's no common ground in that at all. Yeah, I mean, how much deeper are they willing to dig their hole before Trump's term begins? Yeah, they still got right till, was it January 20th? So they still got almost three months, two and a half months. And I'm sure they're going to be, it's going to be more than taking W off the keyboard, which is what happened after when Trump won, when Bush won. But is this the first election in decades, the first election in decades without a Bush, a Clinton, a Biden, or an Obama in, right? Europe cannot afford the war and social benefits and the expensive gas they no longer get from Russia, right? Yeah. Now, people, most people don't have principles, they just have profits, right?
[49:18] 48 years, has it been that long? 48 years since four families have been on the ballot. So, it's funny because people are, and I get it, right? But people are very, very invested in politics because they want politicians to solve their personal relationships. And the way that corruption is fought is at the personal level. And the way that corruption is fought is through moral clarity and ostracism. Moral clarity and ostracism. So if there are people who cheer on war in order to retain the right to kill babies at term, that's where the battle for good and evil rages. and it rages in moral clarity and ostracism. It doesn't rage in yelling at people. It doesn't rage in violence. It doesn't rage in anything like that.
[50:13] It just, it, the battle rages, in ostracizing those who thirst to enact evil.
[50:29] The battle rages in ostracizing those who thirst to enact evil. All right, boys and girls, who's donating to staff after this stream? Let's get some commitments. I appreciate that. I know you're all supporters, so I appreciate that. But so, of course, I was talking about this for decades, which is that the personal is the political. Because here's the problem, right? And it's, I'm again I'm just going to be perfectly frank here uh but uh the problem is that the the people on the right uh and this comes from some wonderful aspects of Christianity but you're going to heal all of you're going to hear all of this uh well we need to heal uh this divided nation we need to join together we need to move forward and it's like I no no I mean again I'm just talking at a personal level, right? At a personal level, no, no.
[51:23] You can't make compromise with open corruption, right? I mean, the people who wanted to take away your kids because you wouldn't jab them with mystery joy juice, the people who wanted to, you thrown in camps because you wouldn't submit to all of this, like you wouldn't, you wouldn't compromise with anything like that. And they've already signaled that they don't want to compromise with you, and morality is a relationship. I'm very, very happy always to compromise with people who are willing to compromise with me. That's meeting in the middle, right? That's a beautiful thing. I love that compromise is part of life, and it's a healthy and beautiful part of life. Compromise comes from empathy, but compromise is earned through compromise.
[52:06] Right? Compromise is like a relationship bank. You deposit compromise and then later you can withdraw compromise.
[52:14] The compromise is earned through the deposits of compromise. Now, when people have called you garbage, racist, misogynist, phobic of every flavor, when people have called you followers of Hitler and Nazi and cult and so on, like Nazi is definitely a call for violence, right because the nazis were defeated through mass violence right and so nazi and and so on uh racist is more of a plea for an assault but nazi is definitely a plea for even more extreme uh violence right even more extreme violence so because i mean nazis were killed and that's how Nazism was solved, right? So, if people have escalated their rhetoric to the point where they are calling you as evil as they come and so on, and rousing threats of violence against you.
[53:16] Then there's no compromise. I mean, of course, you know, we always see this scene in a movie where the bad guy is going to shoot the good guy, and then the good guy gets the gun, and now the bad guy's all about the compromise and, you know, you don't understand. And I was, it wasn't my fault and it wasn't my choice. And I want to work with you. But that's just until he gets the gun back. Everybody knows that, right? Everybody knows that. It's boring, right? So, there is a great temptation when you have a victory to be magnanimous. And that is a wonderful thing. If the people who, if they gain victory over you, would they be magnanimous to you?
[53:59] Thank you, Steve. And so, if, like, magnanimity is a lovely thing, if it's reciprocal, right? But if it wasn't, if it wouldn't have been reciprocal, then it is a sin against justice, to extend the olive branch to people who've just dropped a baseball bat.
[54:37] So that is going to be the great temptation is to have the advantage to say, oh gosh, oh gosh, now we have the advantage. Thank goodness. And just talking in personal life, right? Oh, you know, they'll come around. And I don't have to have this confrontation and shovel all of the confrontation onto Donald Trump. And this happened in 2016, for sure. And I talked about this back in the day, right? But the goal, and I understand this, I absolutely, completely and totally sympathize with and understand this, for sure.
[55:13] Which is the confrontation with corruption has been thrown over to Tulsi Gabbard, to Donald Trump, to Elon Musk, to Vivek Ramaswamy, who also did fantastic work in his conversations. I mean, that guy is a gentle giant and an intellectual giant and incredibly talented by the by, right? I mean, a great tennis player, a great pianist, a great public speaker, a great theoretician, great at business. I mean, the man is a force of nature, and I think I've got the name right, Vivek Ramaswamy, and a very, very, very, very, very impressive human being. I mean, absolutely no question. And so that, and sorry, I forgot to mention him earlier, but that whole team of people.
[56:02] Robert F. Kennedy Jr., I mean, the idea that he can go in and try to make America healthy again, the illness and the pathological ill health of Americans is truly, truly staggering. It is almost beyond comprehension. What is it a friend of mine said like 30 years ago, and she took a flight from America to Canada, and she's like, I could feel the plane, I could feel people getting thinner as we crossed the 48th. And of course, wanting people sick and dependent, single, sick, paranoid, porn addicted, and dependent, that is, and frightened, right? And that's what drives people in the arms of the state. And there's a lot of people in politics who don't care how much misery and mental health problems they provoke by constantly terrifying the population, they don't care, right? They're just as long as I get power, right? And so people, and this is why I'm not in politics, right? But people want to throw over the ostracism of corruption to the political realm and they want to befriend and stay nice, right? Nice. And nice is great, but it's a relationship.
[57:12] Nice is great, but it is a relationship. And if people are summoning, in a sense, right, so the negative labels are there to summon aggression against you, right? It's like the laser painting, right? So things can go on, right?
[57:31] Provoking anxiety is a feature, not a bug. Yeah, absolutely. They don't care if women are childless, loveless, lonely, isolated, anxious, miserable, depressed, medicated. They don't care as long as single women vote for the left they'll provoke this and that's uh i mean just absolutely monstrous so the good news is the good news is that there will be some people on the left who recognize things have gone too far and they'll also recognize that they were lied to and there will be some uh potential right some potential move towards some kind of sanity there will of course also people are facing their fears right this sort of happened mental uh health improved significantly among British women after the death of Princess Diana, because a certain amount of princess fantasies got erased in that grim Paris tunnel, but there will be people who will become significantly mentally more robust and healthier as a result of this election. Because, I mean, it's obvious, I'll just touch on it briefly because you're a very smart audience, but it's because they've been told, you know, Donald Trump's a Nazi, he's a fascist, so he's both a national socialist and a fascist, right?
[58:42] So he's a dictator, and he's going to, you know, kill people and jail his political opponents and all this other sort of projection stuff. So what's going to happen is this stuff's not going to happen. Well, I mean, it depends. If he's going to try and enforce certain laws that might have been broken in the past, that may reach to some high areas and then people will provoke all of this stuff. But at some point by people who have been terrified of this and are crying and sobbing and, you know, literally shaking that sort of meme, they're going to say, well, this stuff really isn't coming true. Maybe I was lied to you.
[59:16] And your worst fear has come true and nothing really bad happened, right? So that may be a path to some more robust mental health among people, realizing that they might have been in a verbally abused relationship with propagandists, right? So, I mean, that's a possibility. All right. So, happy to take any other questions or comments. I just want to dip in here real quick, freedomaid.com slash donate, if you'd like to help out the show. I would massively appreciate it. And I will take into, I will take under advisement your request for politics and all of that. So.
[59:56] Trump might declare a state of catastrophe, which as I understand it is solely up to the administration to do. Well, you know, and the sort of interesting question is, does the Epstein, does the Epstein list get, um, get released, which is what Elon Musk did? Uh, are they going to go after, uh, uh, the child sex traffickers? Are they going to go after the pedos? Are they going to go after this? Right. Cause that is probably a, uh, a big thing that that is going to be, that is going to be an ugly thing as a whole. And I'm not saying it's not necessary, but it is going to be brutal and an ugly, ugly process. Thoroughly enjoy your political takes. Well, thank you. I appreciate that. I don't think it's a state of catastrophe. I think it's a state of emergency. I know a little bit more about that in Canada for obvious reasons than I do about that in the States. Thank you for talking about this. Yeah. I mean, hit me with a Y, an N if you didn't find this particularly helpful or interesting, which is totally fine. I'm always trying to get feedback hit me with an n if this was less important and hit me with a y uh if more trump's mentor roy cohen was heavily involved with sexual blackmail wrongs is that true i don't know i don't know i don't know these things, uh yes you find it helpful great stream thank you yes yes yes yes yes okay good good good yeah so go spread the word that uh if people are voting for warmongers in order to protect the right to kill healthy babies at term that.
[1:01:23] Happy to join a stream and have celebration of sorts good news for once yes, I appreciate that has she conceded let's see here, Harris concedes has she conceded, Kamala Harris concedes in a shocking call to Trump okay good let's uh let's see what do they say here, Kamala Harris um let's see here uh continue reading blah blah blah, uh
[1:02:08] Uh nothing really here.
[1:02:14] Boom the people have spoken uh reportedly called donald trump to concede the presidential election to call the former gesture of acceptance following a highly charged election i like how they say highly charged like they didn't fuel every flame known to man right signals an official end to one of the most polarized yeah just mysteriously polarized it's like the arson saying the mysterious fire, right? Uh, let's see here. Harris placed a call early Wednesday morning. Congratulations. She reportedly acknowledged the outcome as the will of the American people, wished him success on his second term. Has she given a speech to urge her, um, to urge her followers to? All right. So anyway, all right. Uh, any other last comments or questions? Appreciate your time today.
[1:03:05] She'll make a speech yeah thank you for the tip, what are the top three things Trump's administration can do that would make the most impact on the future I don't know I don't know I mean obviously protect free speech and cut spending and, protect Bitcoin let's see here I wish they would record and release that phone call I don't think so, Chris Langan did not seem familiar with you or Freedomain given how he mischaracterized all philosophers of the day. Okay, who the heck is Chris Langan? Who be that?
[1:03:46] A genius with an IQ of 195. Spent most of his life as a bouncer in a bar. Okay, all right. Uh let's see here, has bono driven off a cliff yet was that ever verified i don't know was that was that verified was that verified, i don't know i i just heard about i never saw him in his own words, What does they say? Trump is the ultimate abuser because he beats so many women. I'm happy to catch the stream at work. Interesting thoughts on a great way to break up the work day. Excellent. Excellent. Well, you know, it's, um, it's going to come down to people's personal relationships. Oh, the man is, Trump is sharp, high energy. My God, the guy's like the night before, the day after the election, he's like two in the morning dancing at a, I mean, that's amazing. You know, I need my pretty sleep, but the man can get by on virtually nothing. And Rogan said this, you know, Joe Rogan. So you see how brave Joe Rogan was? Because nine years after Trump became a political force, the day before the election, he finally endorses Trump.
[1:05:05] Whoa, the courage is blinding.
[1:05:15] Oh boy well even california's getting a little tough on crime you know these this these sort of pendulum is a kind of karma but yeah i love that thing i love that thing i love that thing, after nine long years one day before although maybe maybe joe rogan's audience is so stoned they need it one day before so they don't forget it because if it was two days before it would disappear in a haze of cush yes that was funny i thought that oh wow look at that moral courage when Trump's almost a shoe in nine years too late. Yes, I'm endorsing the guy. Oh, what's that like they say about women that they just wait at the finish line and bang the winners? Look at that courage. Oh, look at that courage. I mean, geez, they even flipped the governor's mansion in Puerto Rico, for heaven's sake. It was just wild. Oh, yeah, I thought that was just great.
[1:06:24] I'd love to see Elon Musk speak to Stef in order to try and fix his current family situation. It would be a tough, I mean, obviously he won't, but it would be a tough call in with all those pauses and restatements. I mean, I get his brain is a hyper accelerant, and it is tough to get all of the thoughts of the brain out in some kind of fluid way. hey, that's sort of my gig, as opposed to that I'm not an engineer or anything like that, although I guess I was a software guy for a long time. But this pause and restarts and staccato semi-autistic speaking style would drive me a little nuts. But hey, you know, congrats to Ron Paul. Congratulations to all of the people who might now take on government spending and try to get things to be more efficient, that is really something to see. And I have had made my predictions about these things, but a philosopher, of course, always wants to be wrong, right? A philosopher is always overjoyed to be wrong, particularly a moral philosopher. So I'm hoping to be wrong about my predictions, but we will see how things go. All right. Thanks everyone so much. Thank you for your support. FreedomAid.com slash donate to help out the show. Let's come in under an hour. lots of love for you guys I'll see you tonight, in the live stream and thank you for keeping the lights on and the show running these many years I really really appreciate it as I believe the future does as well alright take care bye.
Support the show, using a variety of donation methods
Support the show
