The word terrorism is notoriously hard to define, for reasons which will become clear in a few minutes.
The term "terrorism" comes from Latin terrere, "to frighten." A dictionary definition is:
Edward Peck, former U.S. Chief of Mission in Iraq under Jimmy Carter:
The death count for US imperialism has been conservatively estimated at almost 30,000,000 souls.
However, all this almost completely misses the point and true definition of terrorism.
If they did, there would be no wars.
The bill is in yours, and your children's.
Well, for the same reason that you would pay off Tony Soprano.
Because the government "uses force or threats to demoralize, intimidate, and subjugate" you.
This is the reality of human farming.
And that is only the beginning.
It is always hard to truly see the terrorism involved in advancing causes we believe are good.
I think that these are all goals that we would accept as good.
How are these goals pursued in a statist society?
First, terrorism is used to extract money from the general population.
Every policy the government has is a political policy.
The only fundamental weapon any government has is the legal initiation of the use of force.
The initiation of violence in order to achieve a political policy is terrorism.
The war on drugs is a political policy which is entirely dependent upon the initiation of violence.
The welfare state is a political policy which is entirely dependent upon the initiation of violence.
This is why terrorism is so impossible to define.
We are educated by terrorists.
We are controlled, kidnapped, imprisoned and bribed by terrorists.
And when we see it, and feel it, and speak it clearly, it will end.
Support the show, using a variety of donation methods
Support the show
Recent Comments